<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu/EXT4 Boots in 21.4 Seconds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/</link>
	<description>salty nothings are yummier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonic</title>
		<link>http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inportb.com/?p=272#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Well, except it&#039;s the actual kernel, so that wouldn&#039;t work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, except it&#8217;s the actual kernel, so that wouldn&#8217;t work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiang Yio</title>
		<link>http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiang Yio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inportb.com/?p=272#comment-685</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s still quite a bit of work to get the boot times even smaller. We&#039;ll see ;p

@Sonic: Often, you could install software from older repositories. It might be slightly risky, but I do it anyway and most of the time it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s still quite a bit of work to get the boot times even smaller. We&#8217;ll see ;p</p>
<p>@Sonic: Often, you could install software from older repositories. It might be slightly risky, but I do it anyway and most of the time it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonic</title>
		<link>http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inportb.com/?p=272#comment-684</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s faster than I get with an optimized kernel on 8.10. I wonder if the array repo has 9.04 support yet. If so, I should try this... 21.4 sec boot is awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s faster than I get with an optimized kernel on 8.10. I wonder if the array repo has 9.04 support yet. If so, I should try this&#8230; 21.4 sec boot is awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMC</title>
		<link>http://inportb.com/2009/01/15/ubuntuext4-boots-in-214-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>TMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inportb.com/?p=272#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Seriously 21.4 seconds?? Woah now thats fast for Ubuntu.....any other new features in beta 3 or is just ext4 support??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously 21.4 seconds?? Woah now thats fast for Ubuntu&#8230;..any other new features in beta 3 or is just ext4 support??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
